MIDTERM REVIEW COMMENTS
Midterm Review Comments are now posted via the following link: ARCH 451_MIDTERM REVIEW COMMENTS. Comments are included from everyone’s review and overall comments from the review are listed at the end of the document. Below are some of the overall comments
1- Think about this as a project not only for SDSU , but for everyone who wants to come to SDSU from other nations. This is more than a language center, a cultural center, etc.
2- Modular Systems:
- Are about the part to whole relationship
- How “thick” is the relationship between the part to whole. Is there a void? Is there another material? Is there a gradient?
3- Take a political position. It does not need to be explicit, but it needs to be there.
4- Look at TSCHUMI_Abstract Mediation and Strategy. You all read this in 3rd year. These strategies along with the COMAE principles are great ways of thinking about the site.
MOVING FORWARD
Angela Deuber | http://afasiaarchzine.com/2015/06/angela-deuber-4/

Angela Deuber | http://www.angeladeuber.com/ADA_Thal-Information.html
IN CLASS: You will begin to combine your Territorial Drawing, Site Plan, and supportive study into a 48″ x 48″ drawing. This will be the drawing size you will present at the final review. A square drawing allows for a center and is unbiased in any direction. In class you will be assigned a space on a pin-up board.
BY THE END OF CLASS: Look at the comments from the review. Write down three (3) questions you want to explore based on your midterm project and the feedback you received.
FOR WEDNESDAY:
1- Buy a roll of trace paper.
2- Begin to combine your drawings into a 48″x48″ drawing. YOU WILL DESIGN THROUGH THIS COMBINATION. Bring thumbnail sketches of the drawing types you want to include. You MUST include the site plan at 1/64″. Print portions or draw portions of the drawing.
3- Read Page 3 & 4 from the “Oceti Sakowin Origins and Development”.